If leadership is mostly learned rather than an innate ability, then continuous learning is a vital contributor to leadership growth. “Never stop learning” is good advice, but it is one of those tasks that’s easier said than done.
If leadership is mostly learned rather than an innate ability, then continuous learning is a vital contributor to leadership growth. “Never stop learning” is good advice, but it is one of those tasks that’s easier said than done.
This column is predicated on the idea that no library leader is fully formed, possessing all the skills required for success. Rather, the path to leadership is one of continuous learning. I routinely see library literature and social media posts about low library worker morale and toxic leaders, leading me to question how it is that our profession has so many awful leaders. We have an abundance of leadership development programs. Many academic institutions have internal management and leadership programs. There is no dearth of opportunities to develop and improve as a leader. Possible causes for this failure are many, from library leaders simply not giving a damn to a total absence of self-awareness. For those leaders who do care about staff morale and strive for a workplace where staff want to be, constant learning is a must. So allow me to share some ideas that I’ve recently come across for making a stronger commitment to learning to be a better leader.
Who has time for continuous learning? What are the best sources among an avalanche of leadership blogs and development opportunities? According to research conducted by Josh Bersin and Marc Zao-Sanders, a leader’s first priority should simply be to commit to making learning an everyday activity. They call their approach “learning in the flow of work,” and it’s hardly a radical idea. It’s based on the way leaders already work. Bersin and Zao-Sanders found that leaders spend 6.5 hours a day in front of a screen and 61 percent of that time is on communication activity. The idea is to integrate continuous learning into the flow of everyday work. Among their recommendations, I find two of particular value:
One of the great things about working in a library is constant access to the latest books in the fields of leadership and education. I recently discovered Bradley Staats’s Never Stop Learning (Harvard Business Review) on the new book shelf. Though hardly just for leaders, this guide to becoming a dynamic learner is a great read for them. Starting from the premise that many people are ineffective learners, the author offers advice and strategy they can use to stop actively behaviorally sabotaging the learning process. Among the many books on learning, this one offers practical, proven strategies leaders can put to use. Those lessons are broken down into eight key learning elements derived from learning science:
Chapters cover each of these eight points in depth. Similar to other books in this genre, it has many stories, anecdotes, and observations from research, and is a quick read. The book makes a good case for never thinking you don’t have something to learn. Wondering if you are an agile learner? Take this quiz to find out how you rate on 12 different learning behaviors.
Among those many surveys that ask employees what qualities they desire in a leader, you rarely come across “I want a leader who devotes regular time to learning.” It hardly ranks up there with trust, transparency, communication, or other much admired leadership traits . While some of those characteristics are somewhat innate, such as empathy, others improve when leaders commit themselves to do better. Maintaining curiosity and being open to discovering new skills and ways to improve existing ones, to me, is just as crucial to leadership success as any of the many cited skills that workers look for in a leader. Given what’s at stake—the leadership responsibility for a library organization, a department within it, or even a project team—committing to being your best is essential to a healthy organization. What if you think your own leader needs to be a better learner? I hope they’ll read this column, question their own commitment, and start down the path to change with a leadership learning quiz.
We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing
Add Comment :-
Comment Policy:
Comment should not be empty !!!
Anon Anon
I went to library school in the 80's and remember the professor of Library Admin saying that librarians and faculty made the worst managers of people of any profession. He would tell his students that managing people does not come naturally to most people, and was something they had to study. And that was 30+ years ago.I wonder if part of the problem in academic libraries isn't the dependant role that libraries play in universities. There is no incentive to admit to their superiors that there are problems managing staff (for example, low morale), because to do so would mean potentially downgrading the library's image at the university (and hence less money in the budget). Many then simply want to keep the lid on any dissatisfaction in the ranks, and kick the can down the road until they retire. There's also the general atmosphere among senior university administrators -- when was the last time you heard one admit they had made a mistake? I imagine any library administrator telling the university admin they reported to that morale was low in the library would be committing career suicide. In a sense then, library administrators are conditioned to not want to look too deeply at their management style. In a way it's kind of tragic, because so many work lives would be happier if managers would simply realize that managing people is a skill and one that they can acquire with a little study and humility. Perhaps in the end it really comes down to ethics and values -- are you hired to do the best job possible for your staff and users, or are you there simply to maintain your position?Posted : Apr 04, 2019 08:15