OrangeReviewStarJournalist Rachlin's account of the founding of the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission and the heartbreaking case of Willie J. Grimes, wrongly convicted of rape and sentenced to life in prison, leaves readers wondering why more states haven't followed this model, instead relying on nonprofits such as the Innocence Project to find and free the innocent. North Carolina's neutral state agency can subpoena evidence and testimony and refers cases to a panel of judges with the power to exonerate. Grimes's story is both compelling and enraging, and his thoughtfulness and persistence propel the story as much as the determination and passion of the lawyers working to establish the Commission. Grimes was convicted without adequate checks on the evidence collected, and his exoneration was delayed by the disposal and poor tracking of what evidence remained. VERDICT This sobering account of both a wrongful conviction and the structural impediments to fixing miscarriages of justice (with a gut punch of a closing paragraph) is for readers and book groups interested in social justice, legal history, and civil rights. [See Prepub Alert, 2/27/17.]—Kate Sheehan, C.H. Booth Lib., Newtown, CT
Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.


ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?