Google Books: Authors Guild v. Google Case Back in Court Today, Fair Use is the Focus

UPDATE September 24, 2013 7pm ARL Has Posted the Complete Transcript of Yesterday’s Hearing (PDF) UPDATE September 23, 2013 7pm Coverage of Today’s Authors Guild v. Google Hearing Re: Fair Use 1. U.S. judge boosts Google ‘fair use’ defense of digital books (via Reuters) At a hearing in U.S. district court in New York on [...]

UPDATE September 24, 2013 7pm

ARL Has Posted the Complete Transcript of Yesterday’s Hearing (PDF)

UPDATE September 23, 2013 7pm

Coverage of Today’s Authors Guild v. Google Hearing Re: Fair Use

1. U.S. judge boosts Google ‘fair use’ defense of digital books (via Reuters)

At a hearing in U.S. district court in New York on Monday, Judge Denny Chin said the question of fair use relies in part on whether the project “is a benefit to society.”

Chin then rattled off several examples of how Google’s project has helped people find information, including his own law clerks.

“Aren’t these transformative uses, and don’t they benefit society?” asked Chin.

2. US judge weighs Google book copyright case (via Agence France-Presse)

An attorney for the guild said that while some uses may benefit society in some instances, it should not override authors’ rights to control the content they created.

“Then there’s a question of whether Google has to pay for it,” Edward Rosenthal, an attorney representing the Authors Guild, told the court.

The back-and-forth between Rosenthal and Chin dominated a 45-minute hearing on the eight-year old proceeding.

[Clip]

Another question Chin fixated on was the guild’s argument that the Google service harms authors by diverting business away from Amazon and other booksellers once consumers realize they can find excerpts on the Google site for free.

Chin conceded that it is possible that a reader might decide to abandon a possible purchase because of the Google site, but questioned whether such an outcome was a “reasonable” possibility.

3. Don’t wait for Congress to fix fair use, says judge in Google Books case (via paidContent)

At Monday’s hearing, a lawyer for the authors harrumphed that Google was “the copy shop of the twenty-first century” and that the company is getting rich off book-related searches. This argument may be wearing thin, however, given that there’s little evidence that Google’s book search function undercuts online book sales.

[Clip]

Monday’s hearing was shorter than anticipated and its biggest surprise may have been the high profile Googlers in attendance. Head counsel and SVP David Drummond was there, as well as renowned copyright scholar Bill Patry. So was Alexander MacGillivray, a longtime Google lawyer who recently stepped down as general counsel of Twitter.

Here’s a preview of today’s court date from Bloomberg News:

The company is set to argue today in federal court in Manhattan that the fair-use provision of the Copyright Act shields it from liability for copyright infringement. Authors and a trade group oppose the project, claiming Google has taken away their rights for its own gain without compensating them.

U.S. Circuit Judge Denny Chin will preside over a hearing at which Google seeks to end an eight-year-old lawsuit by the Authors Guild and individual writers. If Chin eventually finds Google liable for infringement, it could cost the company more than $3 billion in damages and end a project on which it has spent as much as $40 million annually.

[Clip]

The issue of fair use is being argued today because of a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York. Chin certified the suit as a class action, meaning that the named authors — Jim Bouton, Betty Miles and Joseph Goulden — could stand for all authors of books in Google’s project. Google appealed and the appeals court overturned Chin’s ruling in July, saying that the District Court should rule on the fair-use argument first.

Read the Complete Bloomberg News Report

See Also: Google and Authors Guild return to court for fair use showdown (via paidContent)

0 COMMENTS
Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.
Fill out the form or Login / Register to comment:
(All fields required)

RELATED 

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?