Of the 36 books Lukacs (The Legacy of the Second World War) has written, this is his sixth on the conduct of his chosen profession. In his late eighties, he is not sanguine about current trends. He opposes current faculty hiring practices (the "perpetuation of mediocrity"); is skeptical of fads like psychohistory and "quanto-history"; multiculturalism, though worthy in the abstract, can lead "not to a deepening but a shallowing of [the historian's] craft." What, he asks, is the future of research with computers? Will young people continue to read, much less read critically? What is the longtime effect of diluting the teaching of high school history? Lukacs has long been a self-proclaimed "reactionary" in a field increasingly driven, in his view, by methodological fads and liberalism. Resolutely old-fashioned, he views history as art, not science, and champions the consideration of ideas over strictly material causes. Some of his fears are real, some seem less so, but Lukacs's views deserve hearing as the reflections of a lifelong professional in the elusive discipline of history. VERDICT Practicing historians and some history buffs will want to read this book.—David Keymer, Modesto, CA
Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.


ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?