Clarivate Issues Update to February Licensing Model Announcement

On March 5, Clarivate issued an update  to its February 18 announcement of a new subscription-based content access strategy for ebooks and digital collections, acknowledging the need for community consultation and a new transition timeline. Because customers expressed that “the original communicated dates for the last orders would pose a considerable challenge,” the open letter stated, Clarivate will extend the ability to make perpetual purchases of print and ebooks on all platforms—including Ebook Central, OASIS, Rialto, and GOBI—through June 30, 2026.

As LJ previously reported, Clarivate—parent company of ProQuest and its Ebook Central platform—announced on February 18 the launch of a new subscription-based content access strategy for ebooks and digital collections. The company had originally intended to phase out library purchases of one-time perpetual licenses for e-content in 2025, with demand-driven acquisition programs and single-title purchase orders to be discontinued as of October 31.

The announcement, which took many librarians by surprise, was largely met with negative comments on social media. EBSCO Information Services announced the following day that it would continue to offer content through a variety of licensing and purchase models, “including perpetual access to e-books, print book fulfillment, and flexible acquisition models like Evidence-Based Acquisition and Demand-Driven Acquisition.”

On March 5, Clarivate issued an update acknowledging the need for community consultation and a new transition timeline, signed by CEO Matti Shem Tov and President, Academia and Government, Bar Veinstein. Because customers expressed that “the original communicated dates for the last orders would pose a considerable challenge,” the open letter stated, Clarivate will extend the ability to make perpetual purchases of print and ebooks on all platforms—including Ebook Central, OASIS, Rialto, and GOBI—through June 30, 2026.

In their update, Clarivate noted they have been “in conversations with librarians, Customer Advisory Boards, user groups, and partners” since the February 18 announcement and, based on their feedback, Clarivate confirmed its commitment to preserve perpetual access to previously purchased Ebook Central titles; to increase investment in Rialto, Clarivate’s subscription-based access strategy for academic libraries; to work with other vendors, such as EBSCO, to integrate with their book and purchasing platforms for maximum choice and efficiency; and to expand benchmark and collection development tools in Rialto.

In addition, Clarivate stated that it would facilitate title-by-title perpetual access purchasing through Rialto, create migration toolkits to help transition librarians’ workflows, and provide data and analytics, as well as regular updates.

Comments on Bluesky in response to the company’s update were no more positive than those reacting to the initial announcement. Several noted that extending the changes to 2026 will only postpone the issues involved.

Author Image
Lisa Peet

lpeet@mediasourceinc.com

Lisa Peet is Executive Editor for Library Journal.

1 COMMENT
Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.
Fill out the form or Login / Register to comment:
(All fields required)

Pamela Tournier

Thank you for this article on a topic that's not covered often or well. Has the Journal or any library considered using actual library borrowers' data to analyze reading habits by genre/demographic? I'm interested in data on cross-genre reading (e.g., incidence of romance readers who also read urban fantasy, for example) but can find nothing on it except anecdotal reports on reddit, Quora, and the like. Such a study can be done in anonymized fashion to address privacy concerns while still reporting demographic differences, e.g., age group, gender, etc. If you know of a source reporting this info, please let me know. Thank you

Posted : 2024-05-21 13:30:15


RELATED 

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?